Articles

PART 1 OF 3 — YOUR IT IS PART OF WHAT YOUR BUSINESS IS WORTH - September 2, 2026

This is Part 1 of a three-part series about a part of business health that is easy to overlook: the condition of the technology that supports the organization.

Most business owners know the condition of their building, vehicles, tools and equipment. They know what needs maintenance, what is approaching replacement and what would disrupt operations if it failed.

But what about the technology?

Today, customer information, accounting records, payroll, email, scheduling, documents, websites, cloud services and day-to-day communications may all depend on systems that are largely invisible until something goes wrong.

That makes technology more than an expense line. Its condition can affect continuity, growth, succession and the future attractiveness of the business.

Imagine that you were buying your own company tomorrow.

The financial statements look good. Customers are loyal. Staff are experienced. Then you start asking ordinary business questions:

• Where is the company’s important information stored?
• Does the company actually own its email, cloud and software accounts?
• Who has administrative access?
• Can important information be restored from backup?
• Does everyone see everything, including information they do not need?
• Is there a system that only one person understands?

These are not really technical questions. They are questions about ownership, continuity, risk and future cost.

A buyer does not need to understand servers or networking to recognize uncertainty. If the business cannot explain what systems it depends on, who controls them or how essential information is protected, the technology environment becomes another area that has to be investigated, transferred and possibly repaired.

That does not mean a company needs the most expensive equipment or the newest software.

A five-person business does not need technology designed for a bank. Good technology health is often much simpler: company-owned accounts, organized information, sensible access, working backups, known equipment age and enough documentation that the business does not depend on one person’s memory.

Think of it like maintaining a building. A roof repair may be an expense, but the condition of the roof still affects the condition of the property.

Technology deserves the same kind of management attention.

Here is the question I would leave with any business owner:

If someone had to take over your business tomorrow, could they understand how your information and systems actually work?

In Part 2, we will compare two financially similar businesses with very different technology foundations—and look at why those differences matter.

If this has you wondering about your own environment, 1-3zero6 Technology Consulting can help you start with a practical, staged assessment focused on what matters most to your operation and budget.

PART 2 OF 3 — TWO PROFITABLE BUSINESSES. TWO VERY DIFFERENT RISKS. - September 9, 2026

This is Part 2 of a three-part series about why the condition of a company’s technology is part of the condition of the business itself.

Consider two fictional companies.

Both have about twenty employees.

Both produce similar revenue and profit.

Both have comparable customers, facilities and physical equipment.

On a conventional financial snapshot, they might appear to be almost identical.

Now look behind the numbers.

COMPANY A

Company A grew its technology one immediate need at a time.

Accounting information is stored on one computer. Shared documents are scattered across several employee laptops, Dropbox and Google Drive. The owner personally pays for some cloud subscriptions and is the only person who knows several passwords.

An external hard drive is used for backups, but nobody remembers the last time anything was restored from it.

Most employees can open most folders because setting up different permissions always seemed like unnecessary work.

Several computers are well past their normal replacement age. They still turn on, so replacement keeps being postponed.

One important application runs on an old machine. Everyone knows it is important. Nobody is entirely sure who originally set it up.

The business works.

At least today.

COMPANY B

Company B did not spend extravagantly on technology.

Instead, it made deliberate choices.

Business files have defined homes. Company accounts belong to the company. Employees have individual logins and receive access appropriate to their jobs.

Important information is backed up, and somebody has actually confirmed that it can be restored.

Critical systems, subscriptions and service providers are documented. The age of computers and important software support dates are known, so replacement can be budgeted before something fails.

The owner still decides what is worth spending money on.

The difference is that those decisions are based on a visible plan instead of an emergency.

Now ask yourself:

Which business would you rather buy?

There is no honest formula that says Company B is automatically worth a specific number of dollars more than Company A.

But they clearly do not present the same risk.

Company A contains unknown future work.

A new owner may need to transfer accounts, find missing information, replace aging hardware, clean up data, correct access permissions, document systems and perhaps discover problems that nobody knew existed.

Company B provides something very valuable: a clearer picture of what the purchaser is actually taking over.

Even if the final selling price were identical, that difference could influence negotiations, conditions, transition effort and the buyer’s willingness to proceed.

And the effect is not limited to selling the business.

Imagine the owner of Company A becomes unavailable for a month.

Who can access the administrative accounts?

Imagine the bookkeeper leaves unexpectedly.

Where are the year-end files?

Imagine the employee who understands the old application retires.

Can anyone else operate it?

Imagine the company opens a second location.

Can the existing way of sharing information expand cleanly, or will another collection of workarounds simply be added?

This is why transferability is an overlooked measure of business health.

A healthy company should not depend entirely on the memory of one owner or one indispensable employee.

That does not mean people are replaceable.

It means the organization should own its own information, accounts and operating knowledge.

There is another concept worth understanding: technical debt.

Technical debt is simply future work created by decisions made today.

Keeping an older computer for another year can be sensible. Using a temporary manual process may be completely reasonable. A small company may accept limitations that a large organization would never accept.

Technical debt is not automatically bad.

Unmanaged technical debt is.

An aging server, unsupported software, duplicated data, an undocumented application or a cloud service nobody clearly owns can all become bills waiting to arrive.

The cost does not disappear because the company chooses not to plan for it.

Planning simply gives the owner more control over when and how that cost is handled.

That is the important difference between Company A and Company B.

Company B is not healthy because it bought more technology.

It is healthier because it knows what it has, understands what matters and makes deliberate decisions about it.

In Part 3, we’ll turn the question around and look at your own organization using a simple, nontechnical owner’s test:

How does my business size up?

If the examples above feel familiar, that does not mean you need to replace everything. A useful first step is simply understanding what you have, what matters most and which weaknesses deserve attention first.

1-3zero6 Technology Consulting can help you begin that assessment without turning it into an unnecessarily large technology project.